M16 barrel twist change

This is where we can talk about our guns. I'd particularly like to see reviews and range reports of your guns, especially if it is a model that others may not be familiar with.

Moderator: darwin

User avatar
darwin
Site Admin
Posts: 1954
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:11 am
Location: Central Indiana

M16 barrel twist change

Postby darwin » Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:23 pm

I recently read something about the M16 and how the Army resisted changing to it. A couple of changes they made were the barrel twist and the gunpowder used. I also seem to remember that they did away with chrome lining in the barrels.

Does anyone know what the change in barrel twist was and what effect it had on the performance?

Thanks.

Sparky45
Posts: 986
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:12 pm

Postby Sparky45 » Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:52 pm

http://weaponsman.com/?p=7291

This gives some info.

rowe_s
Posts: 903
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:46 pm

Postby rowe_s » Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:16 am

Sparky45 wrote:http://weaponsman.com/?p=7291

This gives some info.

good info.

User avatar
darwin
Site Admin
Posts: 1954
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:11 am
Location: Central Indiana

Postby darwin » Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:41 pm

From the chart, it looks like 1:7 works best over the entire range of bullet weights.

Clicking through, I found a good article about .223 vs 5.56

http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/5-56-vs-223/

erle
Posts: 282
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 9:15 pm

Postby erle » Sun Feb 28, 2016 10:04 am

All I know about it is that I acquired a new Colt AR-15 2 years ago. The twist is 1:7 & the barrel is NOT chrome lined.

Erle

User avatar
darwin
Site Admin
Posts: 1954
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:11 am
Location: Central Indiana

Postby darwin » Mon Feb 29, 2016 7:55 pm

erle wrote:All I know about it is that I acquired a new Colt AR-15 2 years ago. The twist is 1:7 & the barrel is NOT chrome lined.

Erle


I was asking about the M16. They did not perform well at all in Viet Nam and the barrel and powder used were blamed for the malfunctions. Some believe that the Army purposely sabotaged it because they did not want it. They originally turned it down, the Navy adopted it. The Army did so later, but forced the changes.

El Hombre
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:04 pm

Postby El Hombre » Wed Mar 09, 2016 3:04 am

darwin wrote:
erle wrote:All I know about it is that I acquired a new Colt AR-15 2 years ago. The twist is 1:7 & the barrel is NOT chrome lined.

Erle


I was asking about the M16. They did not perform well at all in Viet Nam and the barrel and powder used were blamed for the malfunctions. Some believe that the Army purposely sabotaged it because they did not want it. They originally turned it down, the Navy adopted it. The Army did so later, but forced the changes.


They didn't issue cleaning kits the first couple of years; but then they learned and got those out to the troops. About '67 or so. Did the chrome plated chamber and barrel about the same time. The powder had calcium carbonate in it; same stuff as Tums anti-acid. They were reclaiming cannon powder from WW2, the process used acid and to neutralize the acid, they put 20 pounds of Tums per ton of powder. The tums would deposit on the walls of the gas tube and eventually close it off. Found out 5 pounds of tums would do the job and not foul the gas tube. That's why you see WC844 and WC846 powder, the latter had fewer tums in it. It's a pretty good rifle and ammo these days. But the current bullets don't seem to stop whom they're shot at. Saw a post that Hornady 75grain bullets do a real job on anyone they hit.

User avatar
Hawkmoon
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:35 am

Postby Hawkmoon » Sun May 15, 2016 9:49 pm

1:7 is a bit fast for the old standard, 55-grain bullet, but nobody seems to want those any more (except us olde phartes on a budget, who figure if it was good enough to carry in Vietnam it's good enough to punch holes in paper). IIRC, standard issue today is the 62-grain, and the "operators" get heavier still.

1:9 seemed to be the accepted "universal" twist for many years, but with the move to shooting 75-grain and heavier bullets and using the AR-15 as a platform for high power and benchrest competitions, I guess 1:7 is taking over.


Return to “Gun reviews and discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests